Posts Tagged ‘BI’

« Older Entries

Human-centric BI & The Wall

October 28th, 2010

For information to be useful, we must explore it, analyze it, communicate it, monitor it, and use it to predict the future, but the BI industry’s attempts to support these activities with few exceptions have been tragically comical.

The technology-centric, engineering-oriented perspective and skill set that has allowed the industry to build an information infrastructure is not what’s needed to support data sense-making. To use the data that we’ve amassed, a human-centric, design-oriented perspective and skill set is needed. All of the traditional BI software vendors and most of the industry’s thought leaders are stuck on the left side of the wall.

The software vendors that are providing effective data sense-making solutions—those that make it possible to work in the realm of analytics on the right side of the wall—have come from outside the traditional BI marketplace. Highlights from http://www.perceptualedge.com/blog/?p=820

And at the same time we enable effective data sense-making by providing choices of data being cleaned, transformed and integrated when that’s absolutely necessary to increase the possibilities of exploring and analyzing.

With Westbury there’s no wall!

Post to Twitter

2 Comments »

Posted in Around The Interwebs, Products

Tags:

What is BI? – Tweetjam!

May 6th, 2010

On May 13th, 2010, from 2-3pm EDT, Forrester will host a tweetjam on the topic: “What BI is Not”. Blogs about the event can be find here and here, and the hashtag in use will be #dmjam, if you want to follow along.

There are two main reasons why I’m very curious about this event. First of all the topic itself. A solid definition of Business Intelligence is useful and helps vendors in their discussions with customers. I remember that it took Westbury several sessions with HP to make sure that our operational reporting solution for HP Service Manager/Center is fully complimentary to BI analytics solution HP has in this area. In the end a good understanding of all the various aspects of BI helped us to determine how the joint value proposition of HP and Westbury provides our customers a unique BI-solution for Service Management.

I’m also curious to see how a Tweetjam works out. I’ve never been in one and any new marketing tool using Social Media is exciting to me. So, if you like the topic or/and just fascinated by Social Media, this is the place to be on May 13th.

Floris

Post to Twitter

Leave your comment »

Posted in Announcements, Around The Interwebs

Tags:

The brains behind HP Service Manager

May 4th, 2010

While studying massage I thought of some comparisons with my work at Westbury [bear with him, this is going somewhere interesting - Westblog Ed].

In the world of massage, anatomy is a very important part. Anatomy is the biological science concerned with the structure of the human body, including the human bones, muscles, ligaments and other structures. The most common functions are to hold the body together and to make it possible to move the body. The processes of how every structure of the body works together are very complex. Luckily we have a brain that’s taking care of all the complexity and a nervous system that’s taking care of all kind of communication between all structures. This saves us a lot of energy.

When I look at the HP ServiceCenter / Service Manager (SC/SM) database I see a similarity in the complexity. Maybe not that complex but when you think of reporting on the SC/SM database you need high skilled people (sort of like surgeons) to make reports and even then it’s not always possible to report on the subject you want to report on.

Westbury has created the ‘brain’ of SC/SM. This ‘brain’ is taking care of organizing the data from the SC/SM database into a relational database with a standard structure so you can easily report on it. Furthermore the ‘brain’ is doing all kind off calculations to enhance the ease of reporting. The ‘brain’ also contains a universe layer on top of the structured database. Next to the ‘brain’ Westbury created a nervous system. This nervous system is taking care of informing the right people at the right time by scheduling and publishing the reports.

And like the real brain, Westbury’s ‘brain’ and ‘nervous system’ can save companies that want to report on SC/SM a lot of energy, along with time and money.

Post to Twitter

2 Comments »

Posted in Products

Tags:

Information at your fingertips

April 26th, 2010

Do end-users really exist?

I am wondering about the definition of end-users. Regarding reporting or BI, I find it difficult to define these. Taken literally the word ‘end-user’ seems too static and out of date to get around a real description.

However based on our extended experiences of more than 12 years of report building, BI implementations and end-user training I feel the following types are close to what we experience in day to day’s engagements.

  1. Light users – The users who need static and reoccurring overviews. Real time information is not required and exploring data sets or ad hoc in-depth analyses neither. How? Static, free-of-charge pdf or html overviews. For managers and to support fixed and predefined arrangements on information sharing.
  2. Dynamic users – Those who need real time refreshable information. For example they want a real time status of the performance of department during a specific period. How? Reports which could be refreshed and prompt you for the data set you would like to see. For example the report will prompt you for department, region, classification, period … before it refreshes. Process owners, workgroup managers, team leads, business users …
  3. Explorers – Users who need to explore, navigate and visualize data themselves (googling your data). There are certain questions to be answered which need low profile data mining. How? Use a BI tool which provides you exploring data sources, the capability to define your data set by pointing/clicking and easily sharing your results (by iPhone)? It should be powerful, simple, intuitive and fast. Process owners, workgroup managers, team leads and your business for low profile data mining. But are you up for it? Mature enough yet to provide these access and responsibilities?
  4. Power users - The users which need slicing and dicing data for specific answers. To empower route cause analysis when dashboards are telling you, you are under performing as a group or at your process. So not for answering questions on how we are doing it, but why this is happening. How? Use easy to use slice and dice functionalities together with application configuration knowledge to get there. By the way these are your colleagues which provide you also the above 3 information sources.

Do you agree?

Step in the future and enjoy it now at:

http://westbury-it.com/media/product-demos/part-1-introduction-to-report-building

http://www.sap.com/netherlands/solutions/sapbusinessobjects/large/business-intelligence/search-navigation/explorer/index.epx

Martijn

Post to Twitter

Leave your comment »

Posted in Products

Tags:

Self Service Reporting!

April 20th, 2010

Working on our new web site really triggered me to focus hard on the benefits of SMI Suite, our reporting solution for HP Service Manager/ServiceCenter.

Our main goal with the new site is to make sure that the home page immediately makes clear what SMI Suite does and how it will help our customers. Result of three months of brainstorming and editing is the following intro block that will be prominent on our home page:

Westbury’s SMI suite is the self service reporting solution for HP Service Manager

Do you like it? Is it unambiguous?

The main benefit to extract from this sentence is “self service reporting”. SMI Suite will put the power of reporting in the hands of the power users, the ones really in need of the reports. With SMI suite there is no dependency on internal or external BI specialists, no need for technical, scripting knowledge or endless sessions explaining the reporting requirements to whoever will create them for you. SMI suite will do all the heavy lifting of extracting the data from the HP SM database for you and load it into our own SMI database. The Business Objects layer we created on top of our SMI DB will allow you  – by just dragging and dropping the objects  – to build your reports and distribute them to those who requested them.

Check out our Test Drive to experience the ease of use of SMI suite yourselves: http://westbury-it.com/solutions/service-management-intelligence-suite/smi-suite-test-drive

The new web site will be up before the HP Universe in Washington DC this June. This means that we will have several more brainstorm and editing sessions over the content and the layout of the web site. Although it will probably never be perfect, the main objective is to be absolutely clear about what we are doing and how it will help our customers. Once the web site has been launched I will definitely check with you all if we have accomplished this goal.

Floris

Post to Twitter

Leave your comment »

Posted in Products

Tags:

Get started up with Westbury’s start-up reports!

April 16th, 2010

Our Westbury Service Management Intelligence Suite solution contains a lot of start-up reports. In the past we called them “out-of-the-box reports”, but we changed the name for one very important reason. When one of these report is missing one or more important fields specific to the customer in question, they only have to add the missing fields in to make the report suit their purpose. So “start-up reports” is more accurate because these reports can be modified, customized, copied and changed as much as you like.

It wasn’t until a year after I started working at Westbury that I found out that the out-of-the-box reports could be customized. Now we’re referring to them as  start-up reports and that says it all. Hopefully it’s clear that the reports in our SMI Suite are a starting point for you to launch your own, customized initiatives.

Ilse

Post to Twitter

Leave your comment »

Posted in Products, Tips & Tricks

Tags:

Gartner Magic Quadrant: BI tools

April 7th, 2010

You may remember a few months ago Gartner produced one of their magic quadrant reports on ITSM platforms – something we all read with interest here at Westbury Towers because we were keen to know how HP Service Manager fared against the competitors. We have, after all, hitched our wagon to Service Manager’s train, and the perceived value of Service Manager has a knock-on effect for us.

Fast forward a few months and another Gartner magic quadrant is out and again it’s looking at an area pretty close to Westbury: BI tools.

Our relationship with SAP Business Objects isn’t quite the same as our relationship with HP. After all, we’re an OEM reseller of Business Objects – it’s part and parcel of our Service Management Intelligence Suite product. But our solution is also somewhat platform independent when it comes to the BI tool – if you’re standardized on Cognos, for example, we can work with that, and SMI Suite is still very relevant.

So what’s the upshot from Gartner’s exercise in compare and contrast? Well, on their quadrant’s x-axis (“completeness of vision”), SAP Business Objects falls second only to IBM – quite an achievement in a field of fifteen big players. But on the y-axis (“ability to execute”) Gartner has it seventh – still good, but not as good. Overall this places Business Objects in the “leaders” quadrant.

On a more detailed level, Gartner says that “BusinessObjects’ reporting and ad hoc query capabilities continue to be cited as its top strength by its customers,” and that it provides “leading-edge capabilities, many [of] which complement its BI platform, in the areas of collaboration and decision support, text analytics, in-memory analytics, OnDemand BI (SaaS), search coupled with BI, data integration with lineage and impact analysis, and data quality.”

In the “cautions” column, however, Gartner warns that “customer support ratings for SAP are lower than for any other vendor in our customer survey”

Overall SAP comes out as one of the better, more established players, albeit with some areas to improve on.
Read the full report here: http://www.gartner.com/technology/media-products/reprints/oracle/article121/article121.html

Tom

Post to Twitter

1 Comment »

Posted in Processes

Tags:

Boris Evelson: 2nd gen meta driven BI apps

March 17th, 2010

Boris-EvelsonLooks like Boris Evelson is quickly becoming Westbury’s most favorite analyst (see post below). In this post Boris explains what he is looking for in, what he calls, 2nd gen meta driven BI apps.

My excitement about blogs like these is obvious, because like 2nd gen BI apps, Westbury’s goal is to auto-generate as many steps as possible out of the ETL components necessary for our SMI suite.

Here’s the link:

Next gen of metadata driven BI apps

Take a look!

Floris

Next gen of metadata driven BI apps

Post to Twitter

Leave your comment »

Posted in Products

Tags:

Why isn’t BI / reporting supporting your ITSM efforts?

February 18th, 2010

I read an interesting blog on complaints and potential reasons around BI/reporting in the organization.

10 meanings of why-my-BI-application-is-not-useful
By Boris Evelson

Which complaints and/or reasons are (most) applicable to you, your organization or your customers?

An overview from the blog with an ITSM perspective:

1. The data is not there, because

  • It’s not in the HP service management application (e.g. HP Service Manager)
The data is there, but
2. It’s not usable as is, because
  • The data is of poor quality (e.g. out of date, inconsistent or not complete)
3. I can’t find it, because I
  • Can’t find the right report
  • Can’t find the right metadata
  • Can’t find the data
  • I don’t have access rights to the data I am looking for
4. I don’t know how to use my application, because I
  • Was not trained
  • Was trained, but the application is not intuitive, user friendly enough
  • Need extensive knowledge of the underlying HP database structure
  • Need SQL knowledge to create reports
5. I can’t/don’t have time do it myself and
  • I don’t have support staff
  • I am low on BI priority list
6. It takes too long to
  • Create a report/query
  • Run/execute a report/query
7. I need to report/analyze on something that SQL can’t do, such as
  • Faceted search
  • SQL on data with uneven, unbalanced, ragged, recursive hierarchies
8. I don’t know what I am looking for, but my application is asking to
  • Run a specific report
  • Pick specific facts and dimensions

And 2 additional ones that  I added

9. I want do it myself but
  • My application doesn’t provide self service reporting capabilities
  • My organization doesn’t allow self service reporting
10. I don’t want to do BI, I want to run my business and expect
  • My application to present helpful information not just present data

Let me know what you think!

David vH

Post to Twitter

Leave your comment »

Posted in Processes, Products

Tags:

Once in a while, someone else also has something interesting to say about BI…

September 14th, 2009

I know, I know, hard to believe, right? Hard to accept that there are interesting things to be said about ITSM, BI and operational reporting that don’t have their alpha and omega right here in Westbury Towers…

security-failWell, I hate to be the one to burst the bubble, but it turns out that someone calling himself BIguru (or is it Big Uru… not sure…) has been blogging about security within Business Objects. BIguru (or Maloy, as he seems to call himself in the real world) has written this piece, which combines a high-level, thematic view of the issues around BO security with specific examples of usage within the BO world. The actual application of security within Business Objects XI r3 is something of a black art which few can hope to understand, so it’s always useful to get a bit of insight from someone who, from the looks of things, is at the coal-face of BO every day.

The issue of security of operational data is, no doubt, going to become more important in the coming weeks, months and years as the world comes to terms with the effects of a financial crisis founded on non-regulation and non-transparency. I have a sneaking suspicion that corporate governance – already a burgeoning pseudo-industry in the noughties – is going to balloon into an obsession at the start of the new decade. Big players are going to bolt down every movable asset and bring in hordes of consultants to define security best practice in order to minimize financial risk wherever possible. And that means that even the weekly workgroup performance report is going to be audited for security soundness, so you need to make sure your understanding of BO security principles is up to snuff.

Here’s BIguru’s piece: http://biguru.wordpress.com/2009/08/28/developing-a-business-objects-security-model-bo-xi-3-1/

Tom

Post to Twitter

2 Comments »

Posted in Tips & Tricks

Tags: